‘Buíochas le Dia, Maire Brandon. Tá sé go breá inniu.
Chomh te. No, no Bríde Burke. The doctor says we have to speak English. Oh Lord, I’m
sweating so. Where’s the sea breeze gone to?’
-Earl Grey girls disembarking from the Thomas Arbuthnot in Sydney, February 1850.

Oswald Brierly, ‘Sydney Cove Emigrants leaving ship’, State Library of New South Wales

On the 28th of October 1849 the ‘Thomas Arbuthnot’, a fast sailing convict ship named after Major General Sir Thomas Arbuthnot, who was in active service in Ireland in the 1830’s, set sail from Plymouth, England for Australia. On board were 81 Clare girls between the ages of 15 and 18 from workhouses in Ennis, Scarriff and Ennistymon. Shipped over from Ireland, they were joining 113 other girls from workhouses in Galway and Kerry for the three-month voyage to New South Wales.

The girls were bound for Australia as part of what was later known as the Earl Grey Scheme, a resettlement program masterminded by Henry Grey, 3rd Earl Grey, who was Secretary of State for the Colonies between 1846 and 1852. The scheme served two purposes – to clear out the young female paupers from Ireland’s overcrowded workhouses and to meet Australia’s need for female labourers and future mothers, in what at the time, was a male-dominated colony.

The scheme was considered inappropriate, even brutish, from the outset and only lasted three years. However in that time, 4,114 young Irish girls from the 32 countries, some as young as 14, were transported to Australia.

A total of 113 girls were taken from four workhouses in Clare under the Earl Grey scheme.
(Figures above). 1

Before departing, the workhouse officers were obliged to seek character references, carry out complete medical examinations and to have chosen suitable young women for the voyage. The Poor Law guardians provided an outfit of clothing to girls who indicated they were willing to take advantage of the passages offered and a ‘sea chest’ for personal items was provided. Following inspection and the signing of a consent form by the Poor Law guardians and presumably the girl herself, the girls’ passage to the port of departure in Ireland and on to Plymouth was paid by the Poor Law union. This first section of the journey was regarded as the worst part of the emigrant experience, spurring four parliamentary enquiries between 1848 and 1854 to investigate the often frightful conditions encountered by impoverished passengers crossing from Ireland to England. Orphan emigrants arriving at Plymouth in late October 1849 “presented a forlorn appearance, after the discomforts of their preparatory voyage from Dublin, on board a crowded steamer.”

The girls aboard the Thomas Arbuthnot were fortunate to be under the care of surgeon Charles Strutt. His duty was to supervise the sanitary regime on board, oversee the distribution and cooking of rations, attend to the sick, and maintain control of discipline and the moral tone on board. Strutt, as Surgeon General of the Thomas Arbuthnot, made sure the girls were given hot baths, haircuts and new clothes before the journey. He maintained his care throughout the voyage and on arrival in Australia.

In 1995 following a visit to Australia by President Mary Robinson, who exhorted the Australian people to remember their past Irish immigrants, an initiative by Irish-Australian communities led to the erection of a memorial wall in Sydney’s historic Hyde Park Barracks offering a simple but symbolically powerful monument to the thousands of orphan girls who came to Australia as part of the resettlement policy after the Irish Famine.

As part of the memorial wall there are the names of 420 names etched in glass panels, representing the 4,114 workhouse emigrants. The following Clare girls are recorded (as written):

Boyle Ann, Lisgann,
Canny Bridget, Ennistymon,
Carigge Mary,
Cariggem Eliza, Ennis,
Carrigg Mary, Ennis,
Cunningham Bridget, Ennis,
Danaher Honora, Ennis,
Davis Bridget, Scarriff,
Downey Honor, Athlone, Clare (?)
Fahey Bridget,
Farrell Mary, Scarrif,
Frawley Margaret, Ennis,
Hartigan Bridget, Ennistymon,
Hartigan Bridget, Newmarket,
Hickey Mary, Scarrif,
Leddy Jane, Drygan,
McCarthy Mary Ann, Scarrif,
McDonaugh Mary, Tulla,
McNamara Catherine,
Clare McNamara
Margaret, Scariff,
Nelson Margaret,
Nelson Mary Ann,
Clonrich, Noonan
Catherine, Bodyke,
O’Dea Biddy, Thurles, Clare (?)
Roughan Mary Ann, Scarrif,
Stack Margaret, Ennistymon,
Stack Mary, Ennistymon,
Sullivan Mary, Ennis.

Irish Emigrants Famine Memorial, Hyde Park Barracks, Sydney

Historian and genealogist Dr Perry McIntyre said the Irish community was the driving force behind building the monument in 1995. Dr. McIntyre later wrote: “We are in contact with at least several thousand descendants and my estimation is that there would be at least 500,000 people descended from these 4,114 girls, even if they don’t know about this aspect of their genealogy.” 2

*

On February 3, 1850 the Thomas Arbuthnot came to anchor off Garden Island, Sydney. On February 8th, the workhouse girls of Clare, Kerry and Galway walked the few hundred yards from Circular Quay to the Female Immigrant Depot at Hyde Park. From the depot on Monday the 18th, 105 girls from the ship set off for the small country settlement of Yass, approximately 300 kilometers southwest of Sydney. Here they were helped to find employment and successfully settled into such places as Tumut, Boorowa, Jugiong, Gundagai and Binalong.3

Contrary to popular understanding, the emigrant ships were not full of illiterate feral females, as so often reported by the local Sydney press. In the first instance the primary language of the majority of the girls was Irish. From surveys of well over half the twenty emigrant ships, twenty-five percent of those on board could read and write, forty-two percent were illiterate, and the remainder could read only. This does, nonetheless, debunk the idea that they were all illiterate. Among the passengers, seventy-two percent are recorded as “true” orphans with both parents dead, keeping in mind that “orphan” in the nineteenth century could mean that one parent was still alive, and this was the case for almost twenty percent of the Sydney arrivals with just over four hundred mothers and 135 fathers indicated on the shipping list as still living. Thirty-six workhouse women who travelled to Sydney indicated that both parents were still alive.4 It was not tragedy but poverty that often instigated their voyage.

No doubt many of the girls had hoped to return to Ireland someday. (‘Bás in Éirinn’ – ‘to die in Ireland’ was a popular Irish-Australian toast). For most, this was not to be. The girls’ descendants and those of the other 4,000 orphans sent to the colonies over 170 years ago now number in the many, many thousands, leaving an indelible mark on the Australian continent.

One side-story, an addendum if you will, is found in Surgeon Strutt’s journal. He wrote that on Christmas Eve 1839 as the Thomas Arbuthnot rounded the Cape of Good Hope and was entering the southern ocean, the girls felt they were losing their last tenuous links with Ireland. Huddled in small groups they began a spontaneous caoin, a spiritual lament for their homeland. Reid, author of the Thomas Arbuthnot voyage described it elegantly as ‘an unexpected outpouring of the Celtic soul’. Ag caoineadh or keening became an integral part of Irish- Australian wake rituals for many years.

Quin village rightly marks the Kalgoorlie gold find by Paddy Hannan in 1892. In some way, wouldn’t it be appropriate to remember the young girls from Clare and elsewhere, who formed part of the Earl Grey Scheme and became the mothers of a nation, 13,000 nautical miles from home?.

1 Dr Trevor McClaughlin, Barefoot and Pregnant? Irish Famine Orphans in Australia, Volume 2, the Genealogical Society of Victoria, Melbourne, 2001, p.79

2 https://irishfaminememorial.org/history/ 

3 Richard Reid, A Decent Set Of Girls: The Irish Famine Orphans Of The Thomas Arbuthnot 1849-1850,

Yass, 1996.

4 https://breac.nd.edu/articles/remembering-and-commemorating-the-great-famine-and-emigration-to- australia/

 

Michael Houlihan

28/02/2022

What did the Anglo Normans ever do for us?

We are well aware of the impact of the Anglo-Norman invasion on our history, the undermining of Gaelic society and the replacement of our native structures. Poor old Diarmuid MacMurrough takes a lot of blame for all of this, despite the fact that Henry II in England had already sought and had been given approval by Pope Adrian to invade and civilise us. Henry was just waiting to finish his war in France before sorting us out!

Anyway, in they came, conquered, settled, married and eventually becoming more Irish than even ourselves, ‘níos gaelaí ná na Gaeil féin’! But besides building towns and castles, robbing our women (and probably taking our jobs!), what did the Anglo-Normans do for us – if anything?

Well, for one, they gave us a whole new suite of names, both forename and surname, to choose from.

The Norman influence on Irish surnames

Following the invasion of 1169, a large number of Anglo-French first and last names entered into Ireland. Many, such as Power, Browne, Fleming, Joyce, Burke, Barry, Costello, Nagle, Nugent, D’arcy, Roche and Walsh/Welsh/Wallace, are nowadays considered Irish and are commonly found in Clare. So, too, are those with the Fitz prefix such as Fitzmaurice, Fitzgerald, Fitzgibbon and Fitzpatrick which most people would regard as Irish as the shamrock. Fitz, meaning ‘son of’, can be considered the Norman version of Mac (it derives from the Latin/French ‘fils de’, meaning ‘son of’). Burke came from de Burgh, Roche from de Roiste, Power from de Paor.

In 1366, a law was passed that “Every Englishman do use the English language, and be named by an English name, leaving off entirely the manner of naming used by the Irish.” This was introduced to dissuade the settlers from adopting Celtic prefixes or forms of surname. It didn’t have much affect as many settler families added Mac or ‘O’ and Norman names evolved into an Irish form (eg McHenry, McArthur).

In 1465 a law was passed enacting “that every Irishman that dwells betwixt or amongst Englishmen in the County of Dublin, Myeth, Vriell, and Kildare … shall take to him an English Surname of one town, as Sutton, Chester, Trym, Skryne, Corke, Kinsale; or colour, as white, blacke, browne; or arte or science, as smith or carpenter; or office, as cooke, butler ….”

Many of the trades of the early medieval period such as Archer, Butler, Cooper, Carpenter, Draper, Skinner, Tanner found their way into our surnames. Other introductions from this period came from the mercenary soldiers who accompanied the Norman invasion: Walsh (meaning Welsh), Joyce and Fleming (from Flemish mercenaries) are examples.

Incidentally, the Normans usually took their surnames from the place of their family origins. So, D’arcy originates in Arcy in Normandy. De Clare originates in Clare in Suffolk where the Anglo-Norman family were based. While De indicated their place of origin, Le was used to describe them, eg Le Poer meant ‘a poor person’.

De Burgh – Burke – from a placename in Suffolk, France

Le Botilier – Butler – Occupation bottle steward

De Barra – Barry – from an estate in Wales

Le Waleys – Walsh – the Welshmen

De Angulo – Costello/Nangle – from Nangle Pembrokeshire

What of their influence on forenames?

 Many of the Normans forenames introduced here were of a biblical or European saintly origin.

 In 1922, Reverend Patrick Woulfe wrote extensively on the topic of Irish name origins as follows:

In the same manner Norman and English names became current in Irish families during the thirteenth and subsequent centuries. These have now almost completely supplanted the old Gaelic names. The names borne by the Normans and by them introduced into Ireland, were of three kinds :

 (1) names of Scandinavian origin which their ancestors had carried with them to Normandy ;

(2) names of Germanic origin which the Frankish conquerors had brought across the Rhine and which had ousted the old Celtic and Latin names from France ; and

(3) Biblical names and Latin and Greek names of saints,, which the Normans began to adopt about the beginning of the eleventh century.

Together with these came in a few Celtic names from Brittany, a small number of Anglo-Saxon names, some Danish and Norse names from England, and one or two British or Welsh names. These were nearly all very rare and most of them soon died out. Of the Anglo-Saxon names, only two, Edmund and Edward, survived. Alfred has been revived in recent times. At the period of the Invasion, Frankish names were by far the most popular among the Normans, but Biblical and saintly names were coming rapidly into favour.

The following is a list, in order of frequency, of the more common names borne by the early Anglo- Norman invaders, the Biblical and saintly names of Latin and Greek origin being printed in italics :

William, Robert, Richard, John, Walter, Roger, Ralph, Adam, Hugh, Henry, Thomas, Nicholas, Gilbert, Geoffrey, Elias, Peter (Piers), Osbert, Reginald, Jordan, Simon, Alan, Stephen, Philip, David, Arnold, Alexander, Laurence, Baldwin, Herbert, Martin, Maurice, Godfrey, Andrew, Alfred, James, Samson, Turstein, Warin, Ailward, Daniel, Edward, Gregory, Bernard, Benedict, Hamon, Matthias, Michael, Gerard, Gervase, Lambert, Wilkin, Patrick, Edmund, Edwin, Hubert, Ivor, Joseph, Oliver, Mark.

 The following in alphabetical order were rare :

 Abraham, Adelard, Ailmer, Antony, Augustine, Brian, Clement, Constantine, Estmund, Eustace, Everard, Gocelin, Isaac, Leonard, Luke, Matthew, Miles, Milo, Odo, Osbern, Osmund, Pagan, Ponce, Randulf, Redmund, Rodulf, Silvester, Turold, Ulf, Vincent.

 The following names only came in, or at least became popular, at a later period :

Bartholomew, Christopher, Francis, Gerald, George, Paul, Roland, Theobald.

 Women’s names among the Normans were nearly all of the Biblical or saintly class:

 Agnes, Alice, Amelina, Anastasia, Annabella, Catherine, Cecily, Christina, Dorothy, Egidia, Eleanor, Evelyn, Frances, Honora, Isabella, Johanna, Matilda, Margaret, Susanna.

 The name Mary does not seem to have come into use in Ireland before the end of the16th century. Brigid only began to be used about the same period.

 

Extracted from ‘Sloinnte Gaedheal is Gall’, Patrick Woulfe 1922

Out with the old, in with the new

The Anglo-Normans also brought with them new animal species such as the rabbit and fallow deer, new foods such as wheat, orchard fruits, mutton and farming practices such as hay-making. They introduced us to continental European religious saints and practices of the Roman Church. European religious orders soon followed such as the Franciscans, Augustinians, Cistercians, Dominicans etc. These replaced the structures of the native Irish Christian Church.

Up to then, the Irish natives did not adopt the name of saints as they considered this to be placing themselves on a par with the saint. Such naming convention was reserved for those of higher status in the monasteries. This was circumvented by use of the prefix Maol or Giolla meaning follower or servant. The Normans changed all of that and it was now acceptable to be called Peter, James, Michael, John, Mary, Brigid or Margaret.

Very few of us to this day do not have either a forename or surname that is not of Norman origin. Eventually, arising from the Gaelic Revival in the late 19th century, new Irish language versions of these forenames appeared such as Séan, Seamus, Peadar, Máire, Bríd, Mícheál, Cathal and many more appeared.

The Irish Church did not condemn the practice of slave-trading by the Irish until the invasion by the Anglo-Normans and the encroachment of the Roman Church. The story of Patrick (Patricius, son of a Roman administrator), which was introduced here after the Norman conquest, presents the native Irish as uncivilised pagan slavers who needed to be brought to heel. So the Normans inadvertently gave us our native saint and a forename for a good chunk of our population for generations following.

Out with the new, in with the old

Children are rarely given these European saint names today. Authentic Gaelic forenames are much more popular. We are nevertheless, unlikely to see the demise of the Anglo-Normans surnames that were introduced here. But all of us Mikes, Jimmies, Johnnys, Paddys, Kittys, Cathys, Maggies and Bridies can thank the Normans for what they brought us!